What is Authentic Randy Johnson Jersey , How to & Tips | Court Makes Mistake in Sentencing Mentally Disordered Offender to Treatment Kelvin Harrison was convicted in San Bernardino County of battery with serious bodily injury. He was sentenced to prison for two years.
When the crime occurred in 2008, both he and the victim were homeless. Harrison attacked another man with a steel pipe because he found a bag of grapes left by the victim where he normally slept. The grapes were allegedly filled with blood, which Harrison interpreted as an omen that the victim intended to harm him. Harrison then attacked the victim with the pipe.
At trial, a psychiatrist testified that Harrison suffered from paranoid schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The psychiatrist testified that he had delusional beliefs that San Luis Obispo government agents were out to get him and his family. Lastly, the psychiatrist testified that Harrisons disorder either caused or was the aggravating factor in the battery.
When Harrisons prison time ended, the Board of Parole Hearings determined that Harrison had a severe mental disorder and was a mentally disordered offender (MDO). As a condition of parole, the Board required him to undergo a year of treatment for his condition.
Harrison challenged the Boards ruling on multiple grounds, only some of which will be discussed here.
The Mentally Disabled Offender Act (MDO Act), enacted in 1985, requires that offenders who have been convicted of violent crimes related to their mental disorders, and who continue to pose a danger to society, receive mental health treatment until their mental disorder can kept in remission.
One of the grounds that Harrison appealed on was that Dr. Suiter, the mental health professional who testified Authentic Norichika Aoki Jersey , did not perform an adequate evaluation and certification of his condition. Suiter testified that he had reviewed Harrisons treatment file and found that Harrison had two previous MDO evaluations. Those evaluations, however, were never introduced into evidence at the parole board hearing.
In noting this, the Fourth Appellate District agreed with Harrison that the Board had made a mistake (Harrison v. Board of Parole Hearings (2011 DJDAR 18383). Thus, the Court of Appeals found, it had no way of knowing whether Harrisons condition was certified by the chief psychiatrist, as required by the MDO Act or even by the person in charge of his treatment, or even a practicing psychiatrist. The Court expressed concern that Harrison was being railroaded into treatment as a condition of parole without any real evaluation whatsoever.
The prosecution argued that Dr. Suiter would never have been called to testify if Harrison had not undergone the requisite evaluations. These lawyers further argued that Harrison would not even have been subject to parole (regardless of conditions) had the Bureau of Prisons failed to thoroughly evaluate him.
The Court of Appeals found this argument woefully weak, stating:
This legal nitpicking points to a larger problem. Dr. Suiter was testifying based on a legal conclusion. Such testimony is not substantial evidence. Moreover, he was not testifying about what he actually observed in Harrisons case; he was testifying based on the speculative assumption that the legal requirements for an MDO proceeding (as he understood them) had, in fact, been complied with. But this was sheer bootstrapping. The fact that those requirements had been complied with was the very point that the People had to proved and the trial court had to determine.
Moreover, the Court of Appeal noted Authentic Nelson Cruz Jersey , Dr. Suiter never even identified the prior evaluators or that their evaluation was in connection with Harrisons most recent imprisonment, rather than at some earlier time.
Sadly, this ruling did not mean Harrison was allowed to go on parole without conditions. Because an MDO proceeding is considered civil, double jeopardy does not apply. So the Appellate Court ordered the matter retried. It seems certain that the prosecution will know exactly what they now need to present to ensure Harrison is subject to mental health treatment as a condition of parole.
Greg Hill is a criminal defense attorney in Torrance, California. He graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy (Bachelor of Science, 1987), Boston University (M.B.A. 1994) and Loyola Law School (J.D. 1998). Visit his firms website is at http:www.greghillassociates or call him at (310) 782-2500.
Greg Hill is a criminal defense attorney in Torrance, California. He graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy (Bachelor of Science, 1987), Boston University (M.B.A. 1994) and Loyola Law School (J.D. 1998). Visit his firms website is at http:www.greghillassociates or call him at (310) 782-2500.
Author Bio: Greg Hill is a criminal defense attorney in Torrance, California. He graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy (Bachelor of Science, 1987), Boston University (M.B.A. 1994) and Loyola Law School (J.D. 1998). Visit his firms website is at http:www.greghillassociates or call him at (310) 782-2500.
Category: Legal
Keywords: Greg Hill Authentic Luis Sardinas Jersey ,Attorney,Lawyer,Torrance,Long Beach,Los Angeles,Criminal Defense,Mentally Disabled Offende Rangers Could Return Ogando To Rotation - RealGM Wiretap The Rangers are looking to add a starting pitcher ahead of next week's trade deadline, but they also have an internal candidate. Ron Washington says the club has discussed the possibility of returning Ogando to the rotation, particularly if Texas can find bullpen depth easier to acquire on the trade market than starting pitching. "I would say don't be surprised if that happens down the line," Washington said. 锘? Crystal Ball 7 Standard is an easy-to-use simulation program that helps you analyze the risks and uncertainties associated with your Microsoft Excel spreadsheet models.
As a fully integrated Excel add-in program with its own toolbar and menus, Crystal Ball pi.
|
Регистрация 
